Linux fréttir

The London-headquartered lender Standard Chartered announced plans to cut more than 7,000 jobs by 2030, with CEO Bill Winters saying the bank will replace some "lower-value human capital" through automation and AI while offering retraining to affected workers. "It's not cost-cutting. It's replacing in some cases lower-value human capital with the financial capital and the investment capital we're putting in," CEO Bill Winters told reporters. "So, the people that want to reskill, that want to carry on, we're giving every opportunity to reposition," Winters said. Reuters reports: The cuts, alongside higher shareholder return targets announced in a strategy update, come as StanChart is at the tail-end of a decade-long effort to transform itself from a potential takeover target to a steadily profitable lender. Its London-listed shares, which have risen 65% in the last 12 months, fell 0.5% in early trading, as analysts said the new targets were at the conservative end of their expectations. "In a world full of uncertainty, performance may prove more challenging further out," said Ed Firth, analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, citing how the bank has benefited in recent years from high interest rates and huge wealth flows. StanChart's move to streamline operations and rein in costs comes as more global firms slash jobs by deploying AI to improve efficiency. Japanese lender Mizuho in March unveiled up to 5,000 job cuts over a decade. And banks globally are scrambling to integrate frontier AI models and fend off rising cyber threats. The most affected roles will be in the bank's back-office centres, including those in Chennai, Bengaluru, Kuala Lumpur and Warsaw, according to Winters. "Of course we're using AI along the way and AI will be a huge facilitator and enabler of that," he added, referring to its ongoing revamp to automate more of its core banking system. StanChart said it would deliver over 15% return on tangible equity in 2028, more than three percentage points higher than in 2025, and building to about 18% in 2030. Meta also announced plans to reassign 7,000 employees into AI-related initiatives, just ahead of layoffs expected to affect roughly 8,000 workers.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Firefox version 151 is out of beta and trickling out to users, with handy additions, just in case you were thinking of jumping ship from Windows 11 to Linux. Mozilla has officially released Firefox 151, although automatic updates are not yet happening at the time we write this. Its profit-making subsidiary MZLA has also released Thunderbird 151, although its new-feature list has less cool new shiny. The Firefox product announcement trumpets a “fresh new look and feel” for the New Tab page. As we’ve already lightly customized ours, we didn’t see that, but you know how it is – this is the sort of thing marketing folks can understand and sound excited about. Apparently you can customize its wallpaper and add a “Recent Activity” feed, if that’s what you want. (We’ve just added a few more rows of shortcuts to recent pages.) A more useful function, especially if you don’t trust Firefox Sync and you’re thinking of changing to a new OS, is improved handling of Firefox Backup, the built-in tools for backing up and restoring your profile (or profiles, plural, for the truly hardcore). The page in the last link hasn’t changed in the last three weeks, and it still says, “Note: Firefox Backup is currently only available to users on Windows 10 and 11. This feature may be extended to other platforms in future versions of Firefox.” Well, now it has: the release notes say it works on Linux now. We’ve also seen reports that it is now on macOS too, but not on our iMac (This could be because we’ve been using Firefox Sync since the late lamented Xmarks shut down). A key addition is that a profile backed up on one OS can now be restored on a different OS, which sounds like a significant improvement to us. This includes extensions and themes. Last time around, we shared the news that the PDF editor could split multipage PDFs into chunks, including saving out individual pages. In this version, it can now merge multiple PDFs into one, which also sounds handy. It’s the sort of feature we rarely need, but when we do, we really need it. Suffice to say that with recent Firefox versions, we no longer need a standalone PDF viewer. As well as over 30 security fixes and the usual developer changes, this release fixes some more visible bugs: multi-monitor handling has been improved, as has macOS integration. For instance, it can now handle links pasted from iOS using Apple’s Universal Clipboard feature, and dropdown menus on web pages use the native Apple menu style. Firefox’s Enhanced Tracking Protection has been further – er – enhanced, and now conceals more info about you – and much more on macOS. Thunderbird 151 is nigh upon us The closest thing to a universal cross-platform messaging client that the 21st century has to offer us so far has been updated, too. Thunderbird 151 is rolling out, although we haven’t been offered the update yet. The release notes' What’s New section only has three bullet points, and one of those is for the not-yet-public Thundermail service, part of Thunderbird Pro. However, it’s easier to adjust authorization settings for automatically-created accounts, Microsoft Exchange handling has been slightly tweaked, and you can sort tasks by different criteria. Since our task list is about three pages long and never seems to get any shorter, that sounds quite handy. ®

An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity: Until this past weekend, a contractor for the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) maintained a public GitHub repository that exposed credentials to several highly privileged AWS GovCloud accounts and a large number of internal CISA systems. Security experts said the public archive included files detailing how CISA builds, tests and deploys software internally, and that it represents one of the most egregious government data leaks in recent history. On May 15, KrebsOnSecurity heard from Guillaume Valadon, a researcher with the security firm GitGuardian. Valadon's company constantly scans public code repositories at GitHub and elsewhere for exposed secrets, automatically alerting the offending accounts of any apparent sensitive data exposures. Valadon said he reached out because the owner in this case wasn't responding and the information exposed was highly sensitive. The GitHub repository that Valadon flagged was named "Private-CISA," and it harbored a vast number of internal CISA/DHS credentials and files, including cloud keys, tokens, plaintext passwords, logs and other sensitive CISA assets. Valadon said the exposed CISA credentials represent a textbook example of poor security hygiene, noting that the commit logs in the offending GitHub account show that the CISA administrator disabled the default setting in GitHub that blocks users from publishing SSH keys or other secrets in public code repositories. "Passwords stored in plain text in a csv, backups in git, explicit commands to disable GitHub secrets detection feature," Valadon wrote in an email. "I honestly believed that it was all fake before analyzing the content deeper. This is indeed the worst leak that I've witnessed in my career. It is obviously an individual's mistake, but I believe that it might reveal internal practices." "Currently, there is no indication that any sensitive data was compromised as a result of this incident," a CISA spokesperson wrote. "While we hold our team members to the highest standards of integrity and operational awareness, we are working to ensure additional safeguards are implemented to prevent future occurrences." The GitHub account in question was taken offline shortly after CISA was notified about the exposure. However, according to Caturegli, the exposed AWS keys remained valid for another 48 hours. "What I suspect happened is [the CISA contractor] was using this GitHub to synchronize files between a work laptop and a home computer, because he has regularly committed to this repo since November 2025," Caturegli said. "This would be an embarrassing leak for any company, but it's even more so in this case because it's CISA."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) left open a GitHub repository named “Private-CISA” containing plain-text passwords, private keys, tokens, and secrets – with obvious file names like “external-secret-repo-creds.yaml” and “AWS-Workspace-Firefox-Passwords.csv” – for six months. GitGuardian researcher Guillaume Valadon, fresh off a recent talk on Kubernetes secret leaks, found the public repository on May 14, and told The Register that he “quickly understood that the leak was bad and that time was running out. A national agency having 844 MB of production infrastructure material in a public GitHub repository for six months is as serious as a secrets leak gets.” Valadon, who previously spent nine years at France’s CISA equivalent, ANSSI, told us the leak included tokens for CISA's internal JFrog Artifactory, Azure registry keys, AWS credentials, Kubernetes manifests, ArgoCD application files, Terraform infrastructure code, GitHub personal access tokens, and Entra ID SAML certificates. GitGuardian reported the leaky repository to CISA on May 14, and the agency took it down a day later. A CISA spokesperson told The Register that it was aware of the report and is investigating. "Currently, there is no indication that any sensitive data was compromised as a result of this incident.” It’s not a good look for the nation’s infosec agency, which hasn’t had a permanent boss since Trump took office, is facing hundreds of millions of dollars in budgets cuts on top of deep cuts to staff and funding last year, and has suffered its share of embarrassing security snafus in the interim. In a Tuesday blog, Valadon said he initially thought the repo “was a hoax, given how suspicious the directory names (Backup-April-2026/, All Backups/, LZ-Artifactory/, Kubernetes-Important-Yaml-Files/, ENTRA ID - SAML Certificates/ ...), file names (external-secret-repo-creds.yaml, CAWS GitHub Token.txt, Important AWS Tokens.txt, AWS-Workspace-Firefox-Passwords.csv, Kube-Config.txt ...), and their contents (private keys, personal and professional GitHub tokens, AWS secrets, ...) seemed too good to be true,” Valadon wrote. It wasn’t a hoax – “The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is aware of the reported exposure and is continuing to investigate the situation,” but it was a “catalogue of unsafe practices,” he added, containing passwords stored in plain text, backups committed to Git, and an “explicit” how-to guide for disabling GitHub's secret scanning. After initially reporting the leak through the CERT/CC portal, and only receiving an auto-acknowledgement as of the morning of May 15 – a Friday – Valadon alerted security journalist Brian Krebs about the publicly exposed secrets, which seemed to speed up CISA’s processes. By 6 pm EST that night, the feds took down the repository. Valadon told The Reg he gives CISA credit for quickly deleting the repository. “Most of our responsible disclosures take much longer, and many are never fixed,” he said. “Managing to take the repository offline in a day is impressive work.” He doesn’t know if any other parties with less altruistic intentions found the secrets first, although the fact that the repository was never forked (based on public GitHub events) would seem to indicate that it wasn’t widely circulated on the dark web. “The only ones that can answer definitively is GitHub,” Valadon said. GitHub did not immediately respond to The Register’s inquiry. GitGuardian isn’t aware of any of the exposed credentials being abused by unauthorized individuals “Each category of secret in the repository unlocks a specific attack path,” Valadon said. “Stacked together, they cover the full range: from destructive attacks and ransomware extortion to quiet, long-term persistence inside CISA's build and deployment pipeline. That last scenario worried me the most, and it's why I escalated through every channel we had until the repository was taken offline.” Plus, the committer used both a CISA-issued contractor email and a personal Yahoo email across the same commits, and created the repository using a personal GitHub account. “That mixed-identity pattern is one of the hardest surfaces for security teams to cover, and it's where the worst leaks happen,” Valadon said.®

You know about shadow IT. Get ready for the shadow AI surge. Employees using unauthorized personal accounts to access GenAI tools are emerging as a growing insider-risk concern for organizations, new research shows. That means workers who have access to sensitive material could be plugging it into their AI platform of choice more frequently, leaving their organization none the wiser. Of the 45 percent of all professionals using AI in the workplace regularly, 67 percent of those were accessing the platforms using personal accounts that were not authorized by their IT teams, data from Verizon’s annual data breach investigations report (DBIR) [PDF] showed. Verizon said that the proportion of users accessing AI through personal accounts now represents a fourfold increase in non-malicious insider actions detected across this year’s dataset of more than 22,000 breaches globally. We’re not just talking about the Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, and Grok, but also various vibe coding platforms, AI agents, and other external chatbots that could have access to an organization’s data in some form. Verizon reported that 28 percent of data loss prevention policy violations involved employees entering source code into an AI tool, potentially exposing an organization’s intellectual property. In descending order of prevalence, staff were tossing images, structured data, documents, and PDFs into GenAI platforms as well. In 3.2 percent of cases, workers were uploading proprietary research and technical documentation. This should concern even the most bullish AI adopters, given the volume of potentially sensitive corporate data employees are feeding into unauthorized third-party AI services each day. Verizon said admins should be doing everything they can to prevent users from blindly trusting technology that is putting an increasing number of systems between this potentially sensitive data and the model itself, including by securing all enterprise asset configurations, and ensuring accounts and their permissions are tightly managed. The prevalence of shadow AI has given rise to new thinking around the matter, including by evolving the idea of software bill of materials (SBOMs) to AI-BOMs. You may have come across these already. Cisco open-sourced its AI-BOM earlier this year, for example, and more recently introduced a tool to track AI model provenance. Ian Swanson, VP of AI security products at Palo Alto Networks, told us the other week that AI-BOMs can also play an impactful role in helping incident responders deduce how cyberattacks play out in cases where the attackers use an organization’s own AI against it. AI-BOMs give defenders an idea of what any given AI system’s configurations were at a given time, allowing them to more easily see what changed and when. "If you had understanding of state and understanding of state changes, then you would be able to go back to an AI bill of materials and say: 'What system prompt was used within the ingredients to create the AI application?' And then see it's changed from a prior state to a new state. So we should probably check this and see if there's anything bad that's happening here," Swanson said. "And in that case, you'd be able to catch it." Bugs, bugs, bugs Away from the growing issue of shadow AI, Verizon said the exploitation of software vulnerabilities is once again the leading cause of security breaches, overtaking credential abuse, which is down 13 percent on last year’s results. Organizations’ patching habits aren’t doing much to help the cause here. The percentage of critical vulnerabilities from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog that were fully remediated was down from 38 to 26 percent in 2025, for example. Verizon also said that the median time to full vulnerability resolution rose by nearly two weeks, from 32 days in 2024 to 43 days last year. That said, defenders have had their work cut out for them, with the number of critical vulnerabilities needing remediation increasing by 50 percent on average. Elsewhere, ransomware featured in nearly half of all breaches covered in the report. Forty-eight percent of them, to be exact, up slightly from 44 percent in the previous year’s dataset. Some bright news to end on, however: Verizon continues to see a downward trend in ransom payments being made – 69 percent of victims refused to pay, while the median ransom payment fell from $150,000 to $139,875. ®

Microsoft is launching three new Intel-powered Surface devices for businesses: the Surface Pro 12, Surface Laptop 8, and a smaller 13-inch Surface Laptop model. These new machines come equipped with newer Intel chips, a few business-focused upgrades, and notably higher starting prices. "The high pricing of these three new Surface devices is a sign of things to come for whatever consumer models Microsoft is planning this year," notes The Verge. From the report: This time around Microsoft is refreshing its Surface Pro and Surface Laptop models with Intel's latest Core Ultra Series 3 processors first, ahead of similar models with Qualcomm's new Snapdragon X2 processors later this year. The new Surface Pro 12, or as Microsoft calls it the Surface Pro for Business 13-inch (12th Edition), will be available for businesses today, starting at an eye-watering $1,949.99. The base model will include an Intel Core Ultra 5 processor, 16GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, and the regular 13-inch PixelSense LCD display. Businesses will have to pay extra for models with Intel's Core Ultra 7 processor, up to 64GB of RAM, and up to 1TB of storage. The top spec Surface Pro 12 with a Core Ultra 7, 64GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage will be priced at $4,399.99, and there are also OLED screen options and models with 5G connectivity. The Surface Pro 12 5G starts at $2,249.99, with a Core Ultra 5, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. [...] Microsoft is also launching two new versions of the Surface Laptop for businesses today. The Surface Laptop 8, or Surface Laptop for Business 13.8 or 15-inch (8th Edition) as Microsoft calls it, will also be available with a range of Intel's Core Ultra Series 3 chips. It launches alongside a smaller 13-inch model, which is confusingly labeled the Surface Laptop for Business 13-inch (1st Edition). The 13.8-inch model starts at $1,949.99, and includes Intel's Core Ultra 5 processor, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. While Surface devices for businesses have typically had higher pricing than consumer models, the $1,949.99 starting price for a Surface Laptop 8 is almost double the original price of the Surface Laptop 7. RAMageddon really has come for Microsoft's Surface Pro and Surface Laptop devices, after recent price increases meant the existing consumer models are now $500 more expensive than their original starting price. The max configuration for the 13.8-inch Surface Pro 8 will include a Core Ultra 7, 64GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage for $4,299.99. A similar version of the 15-inch model (with an x7 processor) will be priced at $4,499.99.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Airbus has inaugurated new supercomputing infrastructure from Bull to help the firm develop future aircraft, but is being coy about revealing how powerful the overall system is. The European aerospace giant had already taken delivery of the hardware, spread across two sites – at Toulouse in December last year and Hamburg in April this year – but today (Tuesday) marks the official inauguration of the system, with 3x the performance of its previous supercomputer. That’s according to Bull, the high-performance compute biz the French state acquired from Atos a few months ago, as Airbus declined to put forward a spokesperson to answer our questions. The new system is based on a modular design, where kit was pre-assembled inside containers before being shipped to the Airbus sites. It is based on the firm’s BullSequana XH3000 rack infrastructure with a mix of compute blades configured with AMD’s Genoa and Turin versions of the Epyc processors, plus Nvidia GPU blades. Also part of the hardware manifest is IBM Spectrum Scale storage using Storage Scale System appliances from the firm, and the interconnect used is Nvidia’s InfiniBand NDR (Next Data Rate), supporting 400 Gbps per port. However, Bull wouldn’t tell us exactly how much of all this infrastructure it has delivered, as Airbus regards this as confidential information. What it did say is that the supercomputer is being supplied and supported on a “HPC-as-a-service” model, whereby Airbus is paying close to €100 million ($116 million) over five years for an all-inclusive deal. Bull is understood to have won this contract from HPE, which was the previous supplier to Airbus. “So Airbus was a long standing customer of HPE for around 24 years, and they were initiating a procurement to replace their existing system in order to get something like three times more performance of their existing systems, so they did a procurement, which is a classical HPC procurement, and we won on the price-performance agreement,” Bull’s head of HPC, AI and Quantum Computing Bruno Lecointe told The Register. While the hardware is located at two sites, Lecointe says they are connected to function as a single supercomputer, although workloads are not currently split across sites but run on one or the other, with a batch scheduler choosing which is the best based on the available resources. Airbus needed a more powerful supercomputer as it is expecting to use it for “digital twins,” whereby the helicopters and other aircraft it is developing will not only be designed using the system, but the entire airframe will also be simulated on the computer as well. One of the tools it is likely to be using is the CODA computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, jointly developed by the German Aerospace Center (DLR), the French Aerospace Lab (ONERA), and Airbus itself. Lecointe hinted that Bull is also working with Airbus on some quantum and AI algorithms to meet its compute requirements, but this is “highly confidential.” The inauguration of this fully operational, multi-site supercomputing infrastructure comes just 14 months after contract signature, Lecointe boasted. The heat generated by the system will also be reused to supply neighboring buildings on the Airbus site. ®

Microsoft is turning Azure Linux into a general-purpose, Fedora-based cloud distribution available to all Azure customers, while also productizing Flatcar as Azure Container Linux for immutable container hosts. "When Microsoft joined the Linux Foundation, there was this big conspiracy theory that somehow the Linux Foundation was undermining open source in partnership with Microsoft, and now you announce that you're shipping a Linux distribution," Jim Zemlin, the Linux Foundation's CEO, said in response to Microsoft's surprise announcement. "That's amazing." ZDNet reports: Until now, [Lachlan Everson, Microsoft's Principal Program Manager on Azure's open-source team] noted, "we had Azure Linux only available to third-party customers through AKS specifically, and that was Azure Linux 3.0." Going forward, this will be ACL. Everson emphasized that Azure Linux 4.0 is the culmination of years of internal usage and the evolution of the earlier Mariner distribution. "So we've been running Azure Linux for many years internally, and we got through to 3.0, and we only allowed it on as a container host on AKS. What we've done is make it a general-purpose, so this is all the learnings that we've had in the heritage of Mariner." Under the hood, Azure Linux 4.0 is based on Fedora Linux and is delivered as an open distribution on GitHub. This code is available now. Yes, Red Hat knows that Microsoft has done this. Everson continued, "So, we made a decision to use Fedora as an upstream, so it's using RPMs in the Fedora ecosystem. Microsoft curates the packages and the supply chain to fit Azure's cloud platform." Microsoft also created "it to be purpose-built for Azure, which integrates vertically into all of our infrastructure to give you the best Azure Linux experience on Azure." While Azure Linux will ship as a VM image, Microsoft is already preparing a developer-friendly path onto Windows desktops: "And as of today, we have it as a VM image for your VM host on Azure. We're going to announce WSL images as well." While developers will be able to run Azure Linux locally through WSL, Microsoft is not positioning it as a traditional desktop Linux. Asked whether he could run it on his laptop, Everson said: "I will be able to run it on my laptop, or what have you. Yes, on Windows 11." However, when pressed about a desktop experience, Everson was clear that there are "no plans" for a graphical environment. "It's optimized for server-side in the cloud," he said, adding that even on a developer machine, users should expect a lean environment. "Minimal packages, yeah. The idea is that we offer you a consistent experience to do your development on your machine, and that you can take your workloads as you develop them on your machine and run them with VS Code. You can run your applications on that, and know that the platform is the same that you're running on the cloud, so that you have that kind of consistency between environments." Flatcar itself remains the upstream project, but Microsoft is packaging it for Azure customers. Everson described Flatcar as "purpose-built, immutable, secure by default, production-ready operating system, and Azure Container Linux is the productization of that, but we're still investing in the upstream Flatcar ecosystem and pulling that downstream into a productized exterior experience just for container workloads, so it's a container hosting in AKS." To underscore the immutable model, he added that "Everything's baked in, so there is no package manager. We bake the bits into the immutable, and they're in the immutable version. So Azure Container Linux is the immutable version. So you shouldn't be changing any system packages or any application packages. Anything that you need to change is customer workloads run in containers."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

If you use Drupal, get ready to patch without delay. The org behind the popular open source content management system is warning of a highly critical vulnerability in Drupal core that is serious enough for it to tell users ahead of Wednesday’s patch release to set aside time to install the fix immediately. The Drupal Security Team’s Monday PSA announcing the imminent patch for Drupal core doesn’t include any specifics, with the PSA noting that Drupal isn’t willing to share additional information until the announcement is made alongside the patch release. That, says Drupal, will happen at some point between 1700 and 2100 UTC on Wednesday, May 20. To reiterate, this vulnerability is found in Drupal core, the bare-bones version of Drupal designed for developers, and not Drupal CMS, the preconfigured version for those who want Drupal but don’t have coding skills. Drupal noted that sites using Drupal Steward, its paid web application firewall service, are protected against known attack vectors, though it still recommends Steward customers update their core instances in case additional exploit methods emerge. “The Drupal Security Team urges you to reserve time for core updates at that time because exploits might be developed within hours or days,” the advisory warns. Drupal also recommends users update to the latest supported release prior to Wednesday’s patch “so that you can address any other upgrade issues before the security window." While it won’t get specific on the nature of the vulnerability, Drupal did share its severity score based on NIST’s standard scoring methodology, and it’s not good: The bug scored 20 out of a max of 25 on that scale, as defined by Drupal’s own documentation. More specifically, it’s trivially easy to leverage, doesn’t require any privilege level to exploit, could make all non-public data on an affected site accessible to the attacker, and could allow an attacker to modify or delete whatever they wanted. The only two things preventing it from scoring a perfect 25/25 are the fact that a known exploit doesn’t exist yet and that it doesn’t affect all configurations, only those using “uncommon module configurations.” Drupal noted that security releases will be published on Wednesday for all currently supported core branches (11.3.x, 11.2.x, 10.6.x, and 10.5.x), as well as unsupported Drupal 11.1.x and 10.4.x branches for sites that have not yet upgraded from older 10.x and 11.x releases. Drupal users on 8.9 and 9.5 are also getting patches “given the potential severity of this issue,” though the advisory warns 8.9 and 9.5 users will need to install those updates manually, which “might introduce other bugs or regressions,” leading Drupal to recommend a full upgrade to a supported core branch. “Drupal 8 and 9 include numerous other, previously disclosed, security vulnerabilities that will not be addressed by either Drupal Steward or the best-effort patch files,” the advisory said. Drupal 7 users are safe. Given the fact that not all Drupal core environments will be affected, the advisory recommends all Drupal core users set aside time on Wednesday to determine whether they’re part of the vulnerable class, and take action immediately if so. Drupal’s security team didn’t respond to questions for this story. ®

Gartner has warned that SAP users adopting its AI agents could face spiraling costs as the vendor moves to a new commercial model. Last week, the German ERP giant announced plans for its Autonomous Enterprise, including an AI platform for building and governing a suite of agents that do business work. With the new platform comes a new commercial model in which SAP no longer charges according to how many users are authorized to access the platform, but by the value agents offer by completing "actions." SAP has confirmed to The Register that AI Unit purchases are estimated based on the expected number of "agent actions for an autonomous domain." The company promised to introduce "Autonomous Domain Blueprints" that would help estimate costs in so-called "T‑shirt size guidance" indicative of the customer's scale of deployment. However, a recent paper from Gartner warns: "Depending on how SAP defines an 'action,' the number of events incurring fees risks quickly spiraling upwards. This would lead to unexpectedly increased costs, especially if SAP continues to charge higher unit prices for AI Units used in excess of the customer’s contractual commitment, or if AI agents consume a digital access license. Moreover, the value a customer derives from an executed action might not match how SAP has priced that action." Victoria Rowan, Gartner senior principal analyst, is lead author of the report, "First Take: SAP Moves to Higher-Value-Based AI Pricing, but Potential Cautions Remain." The research outfit has promised to update its analysis as SAP publishes more details about its pricing model. It is also waiting for a response to a fact review from the company. SAP provides ERP (enterprise resource planning) systems that help run some of the world's largest companies, including Walmart and VW Group. Over the past five years, it has been trying to get customers to move to the cloud and off legacy software. More recently, it has made a big push for AI adoption. In its research, Gartner said users need to take care in how they cost AI adoption with SAP, which provides AI Units as a commercial metric. "The AI Units customers purchase are converted to the license metric of the particular SAP Premium AI services they consume. SAP's contracts give SAP the ability to alter the conversion factors, meaning SAP could end up charging more during the term and at the point of contractual renewal," the paper says. An SAP spokesperson said conversion rates were intended to reflect the usage of the applicable AI features. "Any changes to conversion rates would only take effect upon renewal for existing customers, as further described in the applicable AI Units order form." Gartner also pointed out that there was a lack of "clear definitions of how the customer-built agents' work will be measured." While this remains the case, "it will be difficult to predict and control runtime costs." The SAP spokesperson said the runtime metrics for Joule Studio – SAP's agent builder platform – had not yet been disclosed. Announcing SAP's Business AI platform last week, CEO Christian Klein promised customers could unlock new sources of revenue and make "meaningful cost savings." Gartner advises users thinking about adopting SAP's AI platform to review their existing contracts to check whether they have price-protection clauses for their SAP Cloud applications, such as S/4HANA. They should also get a baseline for the conversion of AI Units by obtaining a copy of the current SAP AI Services List from the SAP Trust Center and reviewing the current conversion factors. ®

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times: Meta told employees on Monday that it was reassigning 7,000 workers to focus on new initiatives around artificial intelligence, the latest change in a company transformation spurred by the powerful technology. Employees will be moved to four new organizations focused on building new A.I. tools and apps, Janelle Gale, Meta's head of human resources, said in an internal memo. The organizations will use "A.I. native design structures" and have fewer managers per employee than other parts of the company, she said, adding that company leaders will send details about the new roles on Wednesday. The restructuring "will make us more productive and make the work more rewarding," Ms. Gale wrote. Meta declined to comment further on the changes. The move comes shortly before Meta begins laying off roughly 8,000 employees, or 10 percent of its work force. Ms. Gale also mentioned Wednesday's layoffs in her memo. "We know days like this are extremely hard, and we appreciate you showing up for each other," Ms. Gale said. According to the NYT, employees have been asked to work remotely that day and emails about the layoffs would be sent at 4 a.m. local time. Employees in the United States will receive 16 weeks of severance pay, along with two extra weeks for every year they worked at Meta.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Microsoft has rolled out another round of Surface for Business laptops starting at $1,499 and featuring Intel's latest mobile processors. The new Surface Pro for Business (12th Edition) and Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition) refreshes, announced on Tuesday, are built around Intel’s latest Core Ultra Series 3 processors and Microsoft’s increasingly relentless Copilot+ PC push. Redmond HQ'd Microsoft is pitching the machines as enterprise-grade AI workhorses capable of running local AI models and Windows “AI experiences” without constantly leaning on the cloud. At the top end, the new 13-inch Surface Pro can be configured with up to 64 GB of RAM, 1 TB of removable SSD storage, optional OLED panels, and 5G connectivity. Microsoft says the onboard NPU can deliver up to 50 TOPS of AI processing performance for local Copilot features, image generation, transcription, and video enhancements. The new Surface Pro does not radically reinvent anything, sticking with the same kickstand-and-detachable-keyboard design Microsoft has been shipping for years. However, the company says the 13-inch PixelSense Flow display now supports HDR, adaptive color, a 120 Hz refresh rate, and up to 600 nits of brightness. The Surface Laptop line now comes in 13-inch, 13.8-inch, and 15-inch configurations, with Microsoft heavily emphasizing battery life, AI-assisted video calls, and hybrid work features. The devices include WiFi 7 support, multiple USB-C ports, haptic touchpads, and optional anti-glare privacy displays, designed to make shoulder-surfing slightly harder for the stranger sitting next to you on the train. Under the hood, the new Surface Laptops can be configured with Intel Core Ultra X7 processors, which Microsoft claims deliver up to 35 percent better graphics performance than Apple’s MacBook Air with M5 silicon and more than 90 percent faster performance than the older Surface Laptop 5. Those figures, naturally, come from Microsoft’s own testing. None of this comes particularly cheap. The new Surface Pro for Business starts at $1,949.99, while maxed-out configurations climb north of $3,000 – and that’s before you buy the keyboard add-on. Surface Laptop for Business systems are a bit less expensive, with the 13-inch model going for $1,499 and a model with 8 GB of RAM due out later this year for just $1,299. That lands barely a month after Microsoft quietly raised Surface pricing amid ongoing memory shortages and broader component cost pressures. Some Surface models jumped by several hundred pounds overnight as RAM pricing continued to spiral upward, driven by AI infrastructure demand outpacing memory supply across the industry. So far, the AI PC era appears to involve rather a lot of expensive laptops and considerably less evidence that customers were asking for them. ®

The Amalgamated Union of Influencers, Trendsetters, Microbloggers, and other professional brand ambassadors is up in arms, and threatening an industry-wide strike (please note: this is not in any strict or meaningful sense true). Elon Musk is tightening the ties that bind, in bad news for enthusiastic social media personalities on X who aren't monetizing successfully enough to pay for it yet. On the site's help page, punitive restrictions on non-paid users are laid out. The current technical limits for accounts now are: Direct Messages (daily): The limit is 500 messages sent per day. Posts: 50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts. The daily update limit is further broken down into smaller limits for semi-hourly intervals. Changes to account email: 4 per hour. Following (daily): The technical follow limit is 400 per day. Please note that this is a technical account limit only, and there are additional rules prohibiting aggressive following behavior. Following (account-based): Once an account is following 5,000 other accounts, additional follow attempts are limited by account-specific ratios. We know, and we sympathize. How could anyone cope with being limited to just 50 tweets and 200 replies a day? All the same, some of the Twitterati are not happy. If you are interested in moving up to a premium account, hilariously, at the time of writing the Premium sign-up page compares the benefits of Basic, Premium, and Premium+ accounts with this vivid and enticing description: In case of problems, the help page suggests checking the Status page, which, as the icing on the cake, currently appears to be down: And yes, we checked. Perhaps the site is simply deluged by legions of Digital Storytellers and Tastemakers who are desperately trying to pay to extend their reach. Meanwhile, other social networks remain available. Bluesky has been open to all comers for a couple of years now. Former CEO Jay Graber, who now serves as Chief Innovation Officer, has some enticing rhetoric, such as this post from October: Be warned, though, she does have a strong position against strikes: If Bluesky sounds just a tad corporate, then we suggest the Fediverse, best known through its most famous implementation and site, Mastodon. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a guide on how to join. ®

An npm account compromise infected 314 npm packages with malware, including size-sensor, echarts-for-react, timeago.js, and packages scoped to @antv, in a 22-minute burst of activity in the early hours of Tuesday morning. The most popular impacted package is size-sensor, downloaded 4.2 million times per month, followed by echarts-for-react (3.8 million), @antv/scale (2.2 million) and timeago.js (1.15 million). The compromised account, i@hust.cc, belongs to a developer based in Hangzhou, China. Security researcher Nicholas Carlini reported the malware on GitHub, and the the hust.cc account closed the issues and marked them as "fixed" within an hour. This means the malware report on this and other repositories is hidden unless a developer looks for closed issues. Some malicious package versions have been deprecated on npm with the message "this version was published in error, please use the latest version instead," while others have been removed. Security biz SafeDep reported on the malware and analyzed the payload, which uses the same structure as that used to compromise SAP packages three weeks ago. The malware reads environment variables and scans files to find credentials for GitHub, npm, cloud platforms including AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, Docker, Stripe, and more. The code also attempts to escape container boundaries. Stolen secrets are exfiltrated to a new GitHub repository. The malware injects settings files into other local projects on a developer machine, for execution by Claude Code or Codex, and further abuses GitHub as a C2 (command-and-control) backdoor via malicious repositories and Python code that downloads and executes content from them. According to SafeDep, "the attacker automated the entire wave using a stolen token." Developers who have installed compromised package versions are advised to rotate all credentials accessible from the build environment, check for unauthorized GitHub repositories, and remove malicious systemd services on Linux. Maintainers and package publishers are at greatest risk as they may find further malicious packages published via their own credentials. This attack comes shortly after another Shai-Hulud incident reported yesterday, and more can be expected. Although other package repositories such as PyPI and RubyGems have also seen malware published to them, npm remains the biggest target and, for now, appears to be the worst affected. npm, owned by Microsoft subsidiary GitHub, has said little about the current wave. In September last year, a post outlining a plan for a more secure npm supply chain was intended to "address a surge in package registry attacks," during what now looks like the early phase of Shai-Hulud, but the actions taken so far have not prevented further incidents. The Register asked GitHub to comment.®

VMware is still able to keep some corporate customers onside - it has signed a five-year agreement with the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) for its Cloud Foundation (VCF) private cloud platform. According to Broadcom, LSEG has used VMware across parts of its infrastructure for more than a decade, and the latest purchase centers on deploying VCF to support the stock exchange operator's private cloud. Broadcom will also provide professional services to roll out VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 across the organization's IT estate as part of the contract. The Register asked how much this new agreement is worth, but LSEG declined to disclose figures. This is a pertinent question, as many customers of VMware's cloud and virtualization software complain that licensing costs have risen significantly since Broadcom paid $61 billion to buy VMware at the end of 2023 and scrapped perpetual licenses in favor of long-term subscription bundles. In fact, analyst biz Gartner has suggested that for some VMware customers, moving workloads to an IBM mainframe could prove a cheaper option than adopting Broadcom's new licenses. As The Register reported recently, half of VMware users are looking to reduce their use of the virtualization pioneer's products by 2028, as many are not happy with Broadcom's recent strategy of only selling a complete private cloud suite in the form of VCF 9. Previously, companies were able to pick and choose parts of the software stack that suited them. LSEG also declined to reveal its rationale for sticking with VMware, beyond the details disclosed in the announcement. "Extending our use of VMware Cloud Foundation supports an engineered private cloud for our operations, while giving us the flexibility to support new services and workloads as our technology needs evolve," said Andrew Knight, LSEG CIO for Infrastructure and Cloud. The stock exchange operator said the initiative complements its existing cloud partnerships. These include a multi-year deal with Amazon Web Services (AWS) as the preferred cloud provider for its Markets, Risk Intelligence, and FTSE Russell divisions, and an earlier long-term agreement with Microsoft to jointly develop new products and services for its data and analytics business. ®

Transport for London (TfL) has published full details of its Revenue Collection Services contract, awarded to Spanish defense and tech group Indra Sistemas in January, revealing the deal could be worth nearly twice what was initially announced. The contract hands Indra responsibility for operating, maintaining, and developing almost all public transport ticketing across western Europe's largest city. This spans paper tickets, Oyster smartcards, and contactless smartphone payments. It covers 8,500 buses, 1,000 stations, 4,000 third-party retailers, and seven visitor centers, running for seven years with options to extend by up to five more. A contract award notice published on May 14 puts the maximum possible value at £1.964 billion excluding VAT, significantly more than the £587.6 million TfL cited when it first announced the award, which it said could rise above £987 million. A TfL spokesperson clarified that the January figures cover agreed work over the initial seven-year term, while the notice reflects the ceiling value if all extensions and variations are exercised, each of which would need to be negotiated separately. The contract's most significant technical change is a shift to an account-based ticketing model for Oyster. Rather than storing balances and tickets on the card itself, data would instead be held in a back-office system, paving the way for virtual Oyster cards on smartphones, though TfL says proof-of-concept and development work must come first. TfL also plans to introduce unique identifiers for payment accounts, which it says will allow passengers to link mobile devices with payment cards and use them interchangeably. This would be a notable improvement on the current system, where price caps – the maximum a passenger pays over a given period – only apply when the same Oyster card, payment card, or device is used consistently. The contract additionally covers new equipment for stations, buses, and revenue inspection staff, and may extend to Oyster and contactless payments on national rail services, as well as commercial use of ticketing data. Indra takes over from US firm Cubic Transportation Systems, which has run TfL's Oyster system since its launch in 2003 and contactless card payments since their introduction on London buses in 2012. Some Cubic staff are expected to transfer with the contract. In 2016, TfL licensed the contactless system to Cubic for £15 million, allowing the technology to be adapted for other cities worldwide. TfL's director of technology strategy and revenue, Shashi Verma, paid tribute to the outgoing operator, saying: "I want to thank everyone at Cubic Transportation Systems for their work and innovation in delivering, maintaining, and improving the Oyster and contactless system over the past decades. The hard work and innovation by Cubic helped make the system as instantly recognizable and successful as it is." The contract gives Indra access to one of the largest urban transport datasets in the world. TfL holds extensive personal data on millions of London residents and visitors, a fact thrown into sharp relief in September 2024, when a cyberattack exposed the records of up to seven million customers after hackers breached its internal systems. ®

Data allegedly belonging to CTT, the operator of Portugal’s national postal service, has leaked online, affecting hundreds of thousands of individuals. According to HaveIBeenPwned, which ingested the data, a little more than 468,000 unique email addresses were included in the vast data dump, along with full names, phone numbers, and parcel tracking codes that could be used to identify different locations along a package’s journey. In 2026, many people now assume that their basic personal data has been included in a data breach or two, and that it can be bought online. However, when data breaches include details such as parcel tracking codes alongside basic personal information – the type that isn’t typically part of every breach – it can provide cybercriminals with crucial information to conduct convincing phishing campaigns. Fake parcel emails and SMS messages become all the more convincing if the attacker behind them can persuade the target that they possess information only the spoofed organization could hold. The stolen data was leaked on April 27, according to cybercrime forum watchers, by a hacker calling themselves “Boogeyman.” HaveIBeenPwned confirmed the breach on Tuesday, putting the scale significantly below what Boogeyman had claimed weeks earlier. While the data types matched, the crook alleged over one million customer records were exposed, more than double the 468k+ verified by HaveIBeenPwned. In addition, the criminal claimed to have stolen technical data regarding the company’s 24/7 postal lockers provided by its Locky brand. Supposedly included among these were locker configurations, private IPs, machine types, locker IDs, and backend versions. HaveIBeenPwned only summarised the consumer-related data, not the technical side of it, and The Register neither downloaded nor examined the raw data. To date, CTT has not publicly acknowledged the alleged cyberattack that led to the data breach. The Register approached the company for a statement but it did not immediately respond. ®

Amazon is adding AI-generated "podcasts" to Alexa+, letting users request custom audio explainers on any topic featuring two synthetic co-hosts. Variety reports: Seemingly to dispel the notion that these "podcasts" will be AI audio slop, Amazon emphasized that it has deals with major news organizations to ensure "accurate, real-time news and information." Those include the Associated Press, Reuters, the Washington Post, Time magazine, Forbes, Business Insider, Politico and USA Today; publications from Conde Nast, Hearst and Vox Media; and more than 200 local newspapers across the U.S. In an example clip shared by Amazon of the new Alexa Podcasts feature, the two AI-generated hosts discuss "the latest music releases." A male Alexa+ narrator says more than 50% of music listening now comes from unsigned artists. "The monoculture is just gone," a female-voiced Alexa+ narrator chimes in. The male Alexa+ host says there has been "stoner metal," indie pop and experimental hip-hop music "all dropping on the same Friday," and adds, "That's not chaos -- that's the healthiest the music ecosystem has ever been." [...] To use Alexa Podcasts, users can simply tell Alexa what topic they're curious about and "it does the rest in minutes." Alexa+ will provide an overview of what it plans to cover, and let you adjust the length and direction before it generates the podcast. When your episode is ready, you'll get a notification on your Echo Show device and the Alexa app.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Brits increasingly suspect the AI jobs revolution may end with fewer graduate roles, richer shareholders, and possibly riots. New research from King's College London found that more than one in five people in the UK believe AI could eliminate jobs quickly enough to trigger civil unrest, as anxiety over automation, hiring freezes, and white-collar displacement continues to bleed out of Silicon Valley boardrooms and into public opinion. The survey found 69 percent of workers are worried about the economic impact of AI-driven job losses, while 57 percent think the technology will destroy more jobs than it creates. More than half also agreed with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's prediction that AI could wipe out half of entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. University students appeared especially gloomy. Around a third said rapid AI-driven job losses could lead to civil unrest, while 60 percent believe the technology will make the graduate job market significantly tougher by the time they finish university. The study also found that almost nine in ten students who use AI in their studies have already encountered problems with it, including factual errors and completely fabricated sources. Unlike much of the AI industry's favorite future-of-work PowerPoint optimism, many employers admitted AI-fueled disruption is already happening. The study found 22 percent of employers have already made roles redundant or reduced hiring because of AI, rising to 29 percent among large organizations. These findings sit in sharp contrast to years of increasingly grand promises from AI vendors about productivity gains and workplace transformation. Earlier this year, analysts predicted AI and automation could erase 10.4 million US jobs by 2030, while another survey found executives increasingly valued human workers less after rolling out AI tools. The public also appears deeply unconvinced that the financial upside from AI will be shared particularly widely. Most respondents across every group surveyed said they expect the economic gains from AI to flow mainly to wealthy investors and large companies rather than workers or wider society. Professor Bobby Duffy, director of the Policy Institute at King's College London, said workers and students were watching AI development "with more fear than excitement." "The public, workers, young people and university students are watching the rapid development of AI with more fear than excitement, with real concern for what it will do to jobs, particularly at entry levels," he said. Duffy added that the public remains unconvinced by repeated claims that AI will ultimately create more jobs than it destroys. "Only a quarter agree with the World Economic Forum that AI will create twice as many jobs globally as it will eliminate by 2030," he said. The study also found a growing public appetite for governments to slow things down a bit before the labor market turns into a live-action stress test. Around two-thirds backed tighter AI regulation, even if it slows development, while the majority also supported government-funded retraining schemes and taxes on companies replacing workers with AI. Not everyone is fully aboard the doom train just yet. Employers remained substantially more optimistic than the public, with most saying AI is currently assisting workers rather than replacing them, and almost 70 percent saying they are excited about new job opportunities opening up as a result of AI. Whether the AI industry eventually delivers its promised wave of new jobs and prosperity is still an open question. The British public, however, already sounds unconvinced. ®

Britain has deployed low-cost anti-drone rockets to the Middle East, just weeks after successful tests of the equipment were announced. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) says the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) will be fitted to British Typhoon jets, and has already seen operational use in the Middle East with No. 9 Squadron RAF. As reported by The Register last month, APKWS is actually a kit that adds laser homing capability to US-made Hydra 70 2.75-inch (70 mm) unguided rockets. The kit splices a mid-section between the motor of the rocket and its warhead that is equipped with deployable steering canards which flip out after launch. Laser seekers mounted on the leading edge of those fins lock onto a laser-designated target and steer the rocket toward it. Already in use on some US combat aircraft, the system is said to cost $30,000 to $40,000. This makes it much less expensive than a typical air-to-air missile, and possibly comparable to the cost of an Iranian Shahed drone, one of the targets it is likely to be used against. The threat posed by drones to bases such as RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus - due to the US-Iran conflict - has brought new urgency to the APKWS program, despite the weapon's 24-year development history. March saw a test strike on a ground-based target, the MoD says, while the RAF's Test and Evaluation Squadron conducted the successful air-to-air firing in April. "This has been a superb effort working with industry to test and deploy this system in a matter of months, which will help the RAF shoot down many more drones at a much lower cost," said Luke Pollard, Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry. So it seems the powers-that-be can pull their finger out, if the need is perceived as urgent enough. Contrast that with the program to deliver the Royal Navy's Type 26 frigates. Planning for what became the Type 26 began in 1998, and it is likely that 30 years will have elapsed before the first one enters service. APKWS isn't the only counter-drone technology entering UK service. The first tranche of Skyhammer interceptors and launchers is due for delivery this month, following a multimillion-pound contract signed with manufacturer Cambridge Aerospace in April. Late last year, the Royal Navy's Wildcat helicopters were cleared to carry the Lightweight Multirole Missile, or Martlet, which is also laser-guided. Some were deployed to RAF Akrotiri to help counter Iranian drones, while the RAF also has the Rapid Sentry short-range air defense system that fires Martlet missiles. ®